On the first day of summer 2016 I
received a rejection email from a literary journal. The publication, which will
go nameless, sent me a boilerplate message. I was thanked for my submission,
was told that what I submitted would not be used, and was wished the best of
luck on all my future writing endeavors. On the longest day of the year I
received the shortest of emails. I must confess that there is no magical way to
deal with rejection emails. A writer can do one of the following when he or she
experiences a rejection of their finished work: give up or write once more. If
I am asked for my opinion, I strongly suggest writing once more.
I have been writing in earnest,
creatively, for years. I am the guy that waxed floors at Wal-Mart and wrote
short stories in a three subject college ruled notebook at two in the morning
during my lunch break. When I had a route job delivering magazines and books to
various businesses, I arrived long before grocery stores opened their doors to
vendors and struggled with a poem’s line breaks in the cab of a truck before
sunrise. The passion that I have for writing has been met largely in part with
rejections. I know that the life of a writer involves being told that one’s
submission “shows promise,” or that publishing is “subjective.” Rejections from
agents and editors are a lot gentler than they once were. The kind comments
mixed with an outright rejection is confusing. I miss the days when I received
a rejection slip from The Paris Review. At least the Review
editors let me know with as few words as possible that my work had no place in
their publication.
Whenever I face a rejection a process
begins. I accept the news of rejection and then I take a moment to question why
I write. During a streak of repeated failure to see my name in print, I wonder
honestly if I am wasting my time with writing. I also debate with myself if I
should continue writing. Let’s face it, at this point of my career, if I was to
stop writing NPR would not devote a segment of their morning or evening
news program asking where I was and if I was still writing.
Ultimately, the power that a rejection
email has over my life ends the moment I write again. If I were to write only
after having a poem published I would own a lot of blank sheets of paper. I
wish I can possess some Zen perspective about rejections like “a story lives
even if no one reads it,” or “in rejection I found my literary voice.” I am not
Zen about rejections. I only possess an honest evaluation of rejections:
rejections are painful.
Over the years, after every rejection,
I find myself writing again. I do not write with a new sense of purpose after a
rejection. I do not gain a new perspective after rejections. I simply sit
before my laptop or typewriter and fill the page. When a draft is complete, I
find the nearest working pen, or sharpest pencil, and begin revising a draft of
a work for another submission. The more I write, the less the rejection emails
matter. When I write and a first draft is completed, I do not think about the
editor that told me no. When I write and a first draft is completed, I think about
the creative force that told me yes.
Devan Burton’s chapbook In Quiet
Hours will be published on Amazon this December.